The signals almost always exist first: a grievance, a fixation, an approach. Protective intelligence is the discipline of seeing them in time. GeoBit runs a structured assessment program for your people and places, keeps a standing watch on the subjects and locations that matter, and documents every case so it stands up to counsel. A named analyst runs it in your hours, with the whole floor behind them.
Protective intelligence sits between security, legal and human resources. It needs a method, a watch behind it, and a file that holds up afterwards. We run all three.
Threat assessment and management. Subjects of concern tracked on warning behaviours, pathway stage and concern level, each with a documented management plan from intake to closure.
Recognised methods, applied and recorded. Pathway-to-violence models, the Secret Service threat assessment approach, and the site and organisation methods your auditors know, scored and saved against the asset.
Executive and principal watch. A standing watch on a person, a family, an organisation or a brand across news, social and messaging platforms, with a threat read and alerting against the principal's location.
Event and venue assessment. The pre-event threat picture, crowd and protest forecast up to fourteen days ahead, ingress and egress ranking, and a plan for the day.
Insider and workplace violence. Structured intake, assessment and management of concerning behaviour, integrated with your human resources and legal leads, using recognised workplace-violence frameworks.
A report, a message, a post, a tip. Logged with source, date and who raised it. Nothing is dismissed and nothing is inflated at intake.
structuredWarning behaviours, pathway stage, concern level, using a recognised method the file records. Two sources before a claim about a subject.
method + evidenceThe subject, the principal and the places go onto the entity watch and the site watch. The floor reads; the analyst reviews every morning.
standing watchA management plan per case: who does what, the triggers that change posture, the people who need to know, and the check-ins.
plan per caseClosure criteria, a closing assessment, and a file that records method, evidence, analyst and date for every decision.
defensibleEntity watch across news and social platforms, site watch rings with activity measured against each site's own baseline, and the same corroboration discipline as the watch floor.
In your hours, working with your security, legal and human resources leads. Cases follow one documented process from intake to closure.
The analyst recommends the posture. Your leads decide it. Every step is logged, so the file explains itself to counsel and to a court.
Warning behaviours, pathway stage, concern level, the evidence relied on, and the recommended management plan.
Exposure, pattern of life, public footprint and the mitigations that follow from them.
Block, one mile and five miles: line of sight, overwatch, approach routes, camera coverage, infrastructure dependencies, refreshed weekly.
The pre-event picture with a protest forecast up to fourteen days out, a day-of watch, and a post-event report.
On the subjects, principals and locations you nominate. Nothing single-source, everything with its evidence.
Caseload, trends, method effectiveness and posture recommendations for the quarter ahead.
Principals, families and the people who threaten them by name. Pairs with the executive protection desk.
Concerning behaviour assessed and managed on a documented process, integrated with the people who own the decision.
Community opposition, fixated individuals and the site's own three-scale picture, watched after the report is delivered.
The crowd and protest forecast, the actors with a reason to be there, and a watch on the day.
A standing watch on the name, the organisation and the places it appears, with a threat read behind every alert.
A protective intelligence desk under your brand, run by us, for the clients you already have.
A concern level without a method is an opinion. A method without a watch is a snapshot. A watch without a file is indefensible. We run all three, with a named analyst who knows your people and your places.
The principals, sites or events, what has prompted the question, and who on your side owns the decision.
The program shape, the first assessments and when they land, and the quote. Say yes and intake opens the same day.
Assessments delivered, the entity and site watch armed, the quarterly review booked. One-month minimum, then at-will.
| The job | The usual arrangement | GeoBit protective intelligence |
|---|---|---|
| The signals | Noticed after the fact, if at all | Watched continuously on the subjects and places you nominate |
| Assessment | Whoever is on shift, from memory | A recognised method, recorded, with the evidence attached |
| Concern levels | Raised by a screenshot | Two sources before a claim; single posts never move a level alone |
| Management | An email thread | A plan per case with triggers, owners and check-ins |
| Counsel asks for the file | Reconstructed from inboxes | Method, evidence, analyst and date on every decision |
| Who runs it | Nobody, or everybody | A named analyst in your hours, with the floor behind them |
You do not have to hire a desk to start. Pick one fixed first thing, or describe something else entirely, tell us where and when, and a person comes back within one working day with a scope, the date it lands, and the quote. Say yes and the work starts the next business day.
Hire any desk on this site and the platform, the watch, the other desks and the people come with it. Nothing is a module.
The whole system, everything included. Every chair comes with all of it.
We build your maps for you — daily or weekly — and deliver them.
Draw your areas; our AI watches them 24/7 and alerts you.
An AI-driven Global Security Operations Center for your org.
An engineer embedded with your team, deployed anywhere.
A named analyst on your channels, with the whole system behind them.
Hire the team and get the output: one to ten operators, every offering included.
A piece of intelligence work, done for you and delivered on a date.
How exposed a site is, from the fence line outward, with ranked fixes.
Who would do it and could they: actors placed by intent and capability.
What could go wrong, how likely, how bad, and what moves the score.
Plans and drills before, a response desk in minutes during, after-action after.
Physical and control-system posture together, the dependency graph, the cascade.
Tell us who and where. We come back within one working day with the program shape, the first assessments and a quote.